Credit Union Exam Solutions Presents With Flying Colors

www.marktreichel.com

https://www.linkedin.com/in/mark-treichel/

Mark Treichel hosts a Washington roundtable with John McKechnie, Geeff Bacino, and Alonzo Swann — each with deep NCUA and credit union experience — to break down the forces reshaping the agency this summer.

The conversation opens with the NCUA board itself: nominee John Crews and his likely path through a Senate Banking confirmation hearing, and a pending Supreme Court removal-power case that could reinstate two dismissed members or clear the way for new appointments. The group weighs what a full versus divided board would mean for examination priorities, enforcement, and the pace of rulemaking.

From there, the discussion turns to a Mississippi conservatorship that became a fraud. Mark explains the single balance-sheet signal — an unusually high cash position paired with heavy borrowing and low loans-to-assets — that pointed to trouble before the word “fraud” was ever used, and the panel discusses what it reveals about supervisory committees, external audits, and internal controls. All wrongdoing is alleged, and a material loss review by the Inspector General follows.

The panel then makes the case for examiner presence — the “empty cop car” effect — and why on-site observation catches what data alone cannot, especially as staffing tightens. The episode closes with a look at the Credit Union Board Modernization provision moving through Congress, which would give qualifying, healthy credit unions relief from monthly board-meeting requirements, and a candid take on why credit unions still trail banks on legislative relief.

Topics: NCUA board composition and the confirmation timeline; the pending removal-power case; the Jackson, Mississippi conservatorship and alleged fraud; internal controls and supervisory committee oversight; examiner presence and staffing; the material loss review process; and the Credit Union Board Modernization provision.